Who am I? Not the philosophical way… but more, what do I do everyday? You can discover part of my days by following the very unregular update of my LEARN posts.
But I never answered the annoying question, what is my research about? Some hints here and there.. but not a great deal of details
Since younger me was more motivated than the empty shell currently writing this blog, I let her telling you… (there is also a more “mature” version of it.. less swearing, compensated by some sexual innuendo)
Oc(Ink)tober is just finished, Christmas lights start covering the city and I finally get sometime to go back on track with my duty to communicate science to friends (as well as keeping a diary of notions I learn so I feel like I value my time).
It was the beginning of October the last time we met, and what happened next was a week plenty of exciting science: Nobel!!! Let’s learn (briefly) who won, plus (to make up for the delay), a list of associated curiosities.
Almost a week late, the third issue of LEARN is out for your own enjoyment! In my defense, this week I have also been challenging myself with #Inktober. If you are into these kind of stuff, you can also check my tumblr posts!
Good Morning world! Here is the first edition of LEARN, your favourite weekly blog series from now on! This is the recap of what I have learnt last week:
Monday:Hough transform – Despite being extremely surprised that on a Monday I was motivated enough to learn new things, the hough transform was extremely fun to learn. It has a very simple math that allows you to extract linear features of an image. I needed that for extracting some information on sine waves in my pictures. Although for my problem I would need to define my own transform for sine waves decompositions, the simple application of the simple hough transform creates damn-good-looking images!
Tuesday: I learn that I could spend a week implementing my hough transform, or using the properties of my image to do a simpler analysis in just one afternoon (thanks to the suggestions of a clever friend of mine).
Wednesday: Some of my experiments involve chicken embryos, during development. In total, from fertilisation to hatch it takes 20-21 days. In my study, though, I am looking just at the first 2 stages, during the first 6-7h of the embryo. In particular I am interested in the transition between stage 1, when the embryo is formed just from the area pellucida (a thin layer of epithelial cells) and a collar all around called area opace, and stage 2, when it start to develop what is called the primitive streak. What I learn on Wednesday is that the feature that appears in this transition, Koller’s Sickle, last just 30 min (at most). So this would be the timeframe of my experiments!
Thursday: After a disturbing intro about Lotus Birth, and still pondering about chick embryos development, another one of my clever friend pointed out how convenient would it be for humans to develop in elastic eggs. His argument was based on the fact that the humans’ head size is limited by the way we deliver our offspring. In fact, we have merely a brain:body ratio of 1:50, while small ants would go up to 1:7. One could argue that the number of neurons in ants is more than 300000 times smaller than humans, but I would reply by warning them about the secret plan ants must have. In fact, while one might think the humans are the highest source of change on planet earth, they move just about 35 billion tons of earth every year against the about 50 billion ants move around the globe*. And since ants have a very strong social intelligence, it is reasonable to ask “Why are they moving all this stuff?”, “How are they organising it?”, “Are they aiming to rule Earth?” and more importantly “Why isn’t Antman the most powerful superhero of all?”
Friday: Finally, just before to head to the pubs for drink, another clever friend of mine (that unfortunately does not have a blog to link to) explained me about Principal Component Analysis. I found it extremely clever, and I suggest you to check this interactive explanation! (It’s 01.21 am- I am quite tired, and still need to shower and I also hope to get some sleep before working: sorry if I don’t explain it myself)
See you all next week! In the meantime, don’t forget to LEARN Every day A Remarkable Notion! 😉
The average is not weighed, and I felt satisfied with it just because it turned out to be more conservative than 50 metric tons per year, the most commonly reported number on the subject (but of which I was not able to find the source).
The calculated amount of tons is then multiplied by the surface area of earth that is inhabited by ants (pretty much everywhere except Antartica).
Extremely impressive or daunting; inspiring awe: the awesome power of the atomic bomb
informalExtremely good; excellent: the band is truly awesome!
This is the definition of awesome from the Oxford Online Dictionary. I have my own:
awesome (ˈɔːsəm) , adjective
Containing at least three of the following: a good friend, geekery, beer, beautiful landscapes, bits of science, books.
Now it happened that I have spent the last weekend hiking in the Black Forest in Germany, talking about science and Tolkien’s books with a great friend. And of course beer to refresh ourselves after the walking. A most awesome weekend!
All started in the Black Forest. The name, according to Lonely Planet, comes from “its dark, slightly sinister canopy of evergreens: this is where Hansel and Gretel encountered the wicked witch.” Although we did not know about it, we ended up with our theory on little creatures living the forest and the inhabitants of the nearby cities bringing gifts to keep the souls of the forest happy.